<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Carrie Underwood Should Demand A Recall</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.carriebartkowiak.com/2007/05/01/carrie-underwood-should-demand-a-recall/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.carriebartkowiak.com/2007/05/01/carrie-underwood-should-demand-a-recall/</link>
	<description>Student of Life, Mother of 3 Boys</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 04:51:52 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: B Doe</title>
		<link>http://www.carriebartkowiak.com/2007/05/01/carrie-underwood-should-demand-a-recall/#comment-363</link>
		<dc:creator>B Doe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2007 21:06:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.carriebartkowiak.com/2007/05/01/carrie-underwood-should-demand-a-recall/#comment-363</guid>
		<description>Stop hatin on Carrie, she's a better singer than all of yall.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stop hatin on Carrie, she&#8217;s a better singer than all of yall.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dollymama</title>
		<link>http://www.carriebartkowiak.com/2007/05/01/carrie-underwood-should-demand-a-recall/#comment-361</link>
		<dc:creator>Dollymama</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 May 2007 15:28:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.carriebartkowiak.com/2007/05/01/carrie-underwood-should-demand-a-recall/#comment-361</guid>
		<description>Here's the thing....
If you agree to be on the cover of Cosmo, what *else* would you expect to be all over the cover?  

If she wanted to be pictured with a wholesome image, she should have been on Good Housekeeping or something.  Y'no?  Cosmo isn't exactly known for their decorating and gardening tips.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s the thing&#8230;.<br />
If you agree to be on the cover of Cosmo, what *else* would you expect to be all over the cover?  </p>
<p>If she wanted to be pictured with a wholesome image, she should have been on Good Housekeeping or something.  Y&#8217;no?  Cosmo isn&#8217;t exactly known for their decorating and gardening tips.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: keirsten</title>
		<link>http://www.carriebartkowiak.com/2007/05/01/carrie-underwood-should-demand-a-recall/#comment-357</link>
		<dc:creator>keirsten</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2007 18:45:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.carriebartkowiak.com/2007/05/01/carrie-underwood-should-demand-a-recall/#comment-357</guid>
		<description>i totally agree!!!!!! i mean, i saw another magazine "teen people" and it kind of hinted that they were disapointed in her. they said they ecspected her to be loud and obnoctios(sp. sorry i'm a bad speller and typer)!! i mean, not all celebrities are strippers and skanks!!!! if they were this world would be full of crimes!!!!! i really feel sorry for the magazines that are disapointed in carrie, and all the other celebs with morals! i mean, comon! i loooooove carrie! i loooove her because she's not a skank or stripper!!!! i have her album and im waiting for the next!!!!!! 
          gtg!!!!!!!!!
                 buh-bye!!!!!!!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i totally agree!!!!!! i mean, i saw another magazine &#8220;teen people&#8221; and it kind of hinted that they were disapointed in her. they said they ecspected her to be loud and obnoctios(sp. sorry i&#8217;m a bad speller and typer)!! i mean, not all celebrities are strippers and skanks!!!! if they were this world would be full of crimes!!!!! i really feel sorry for the magazines that are disapointed in carrie, and all the other celebs with morals! i mean, comon! i loooooove carrie! i loooove her because she&#8217;s not a skank or stripper!!!! i have her album and im waiting for the next!!!!!!<br />
          gtg!!!!!!!!!<br />
                 buh-bye!!!!!!!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
