Carrie Underwood Should Demand A Recall
I am not a puritan by any means, but when I think of Carrie Underwood, I think of everything that’s sweet, nice, god-fearing, and wholesome. The past few times I’ve been in the grocery store it has really, REALLY bugged me to see her on the cover of Cosmopolitan magazine, due to the text they associated with her image.
Did the editors even know who they interviewed and put on the cover? Do they even realize that this girl’s first hit record was titled “Jesus Take The Wheel”? Are they just completely brainless?
I vote for the latter choice.
Now don’t get me wrong; I’m a firm believer in couples having fun and even learning more so that they can have that fun… but to associate this stuff with Carrie Underwood? To have her as the cover girl for your “Sexpose” issue? Hello?
“How To Climax Together”. “Sexpose.” “10 Things Guys Crave In Bed.” “Read His Dirty Mind.”
Oh, and how about this one to go with the media’s sweetest and most wholesome starlet to hit the scene in years: “9 Times You Won’t Burn In Hell for Being Bitchy.”
They must have just been ticked off that she didn’t turn out to be like their normal star interviews - full of dirt and ready to wear incredibly revealing clothing for the photo shoot. The interviewer even notes in her article that Carrie was “sitting on the edge of a squishy sofa, legs crossed in ladylike fashion, hands clasped on her knee.” The horror! How un-Cosmo-girl of her!
I think Carrie needs to demand a recall of the magazine. I know, it’ll never happen, and it would damage her reputation and make her out to be a diva prude - but really. Is this the kind of magazine cover she’d want to show to her dear grandpa?
Cosmo needs to find a sense of reality somewhere in that big building they occupy - because they certainly aren’t connecting with anyone other than Sex In The City Manhattanites. There is a great big world out here, and not all of us enjoy watching our favorite celebrities covered in smut.
What do you think? I wanna know! Please leave a comment :)
All comments get link love here... I got rid of nofollow!
Subscribe to RSS
keirsten said,
Wrote on May 4, 2007 @ 1:45 pm
i totally agree!!!!!! i mean, i saw another magazine “teen people” and it kind of hinted that they were disapointed in her. they said they ecspected her to be loud and obnoctios(sp. sorry i’m a bad speller and typer)!! i mean, not all celebrities are strippers and skanks!!!! if they were this world would be full of crimes!!!!! i really feel sorry for the magazines that are disapointed in carrie, and all the other celebs with morals! i mean, comon! i loooooove carrie! i loooove her because she’s not a skank or stripper!!!! i have her album and im waiting for the next!!!!!!
gtg!!!!!!!!!
buh-bye!!!!!!!!!!!
Dollymama said,
Wrote on May 5, 2007 @ 10:28 am
Here’s the thing….
If you agree to be on the cover of Cosmo, what *else* would you expect to be all over the cover?
If she wanted to be pictured with a wholesome image, she should have been on Good Housekeeping or something. Y’no? Cosmo isn’t exactly known for their decorating and gardening tips.
B Doe said,
Wrote on May 7, 2007 @ 4:06 pm
Stop hatin on Carrie, she’s a better singer than all of yall.